The Department of Justice (DOJ) wants to end the legal fight over licensed dealers selling handguns to 18-to-20-year-olds.

The political arms of three leading gun-control groups have massively outraised and outspent those of the three largest gun-rights groups in the midterm election cycle, with new Federal Election ...

The group, which obtained Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) records through a Freedom of Information Act request, said suppressors–officially labeled silencers by the ...

Stephen Gutowski is an award-winning journalist who reports on firearms policy and politics. He is a former CNN Contributor. He has also appeared on the cover of Time Magazine and his work has been ...

Plus, researchers from Yale and the University of Kansas join the podcast to discuss new information on women and guns.

We found out this week that the Department of Justice (DOJ) has officially decided against appealing the decision in Silencer Shop v. ATF. Does that mean much of the National Firearms Act (NFA) will ...

A federal judge has issued the first injunction against a “Glock ban” just a few months after another declined to do so. On Wednesday, US District Judge Kari A. Dooley issued a preliminary ...

The increasing prevalence of surveillance cameras, especially the automated license plate readers operated by Flock Safety and its competitors, has raised privacy concerns across the country. The ...

A judge just enjoined a law restricting the sale of popular semi-automatic pistols that critics claim can be too easily converted into machine guns, hours before it was set to take effect.

Governor Gavin Newsom (D.) has called it a “sin tax.” But there’s little record of similar taxes on popular firearms throughout history, which may make it unconstitutional.

A recent piece from The New York Times is a good example of what major media outlets get wrong when covering guns and why.

Plus, I detail the Ninth Circuit’s decision to uphold novel Hawaiian gun-buying restrictions by using a “carve-out” it identified in the Supreme Court’s Bruen decision.