Why isn’t a form of the argumentum ad Naziam considered a fallacy when debating war, just as the reductio ad Hitlerum is fallacious when arguing with an opponent whose position you reject? Why isn’t ...
Deakin University provides funding as a member of The Conversation AU. The “marketplace of ideas” is usually less a showroom for shiny new models and more of a cheery Op Shop. So it’s a big deal when ...
Argumentum ad Hitlerum. It does tend to indicate rationale discourse has ended. Iran is set back and our security enhanced, but control of the Strait of Hormuz has to be a nonnegotiable red line. From ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results