A recent piece from The New York Times is a good example of what major media outlets get wrong when covering guns and why.

Plus, the Second Amendment Foundation’s Bill Sack joins the podcast to talk about the group’s case against a high school’s illegal gun search.

Plus, I detail the Ninth Circuit’s decision to uphold novel Hawaiian gun-buying restrictions by using a “carve-out” it identified in the Supreme Court’s Bruen decision.

Never has a single footnote in a Supreme Court opinion been so misread by so many lower courts to deny so many Americans their constitutional rights.” ...

The Department of Justice (DOJ) has concluded that federal restrictions barring licensed firearms dealers from selling handguns to otherwise law-abiding adults under 21 violate the Second Amendment.

Hawaii can require gun buyers to report to police stations for inspections before taking possession of their firearms, and it can limit its purchase permit validity to 30 days.

A new dispute is brewing between the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Minnesota that may foreshadow the next frontier in the national gun fight.

On December 2, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in Viramontes v. Cook County and decide a question that sounds simple but carries enormous weight: does the Second Amendment protect the AR-15?

Americans favor the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) upholding “assault weapons” bans, according to a new poll. But only by a slim margin.

The District of Columbia’s attorney general is taking sides against the current leadership of the National Rifle Association (NRA) in its legal battle with its own charitable foundation.

The Supreme Court’s latest Second Amendment case, Viramontes v. Cook County, is likely to come down to whether AR-15s are “dangerous and unusual” weapons.

The federal government’s brief in the AR-15 case before the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is among the most important and most interesting. On Friday, the Department of Justice (DOJ) ...