Over two dozen college athletes from colleges in Iowa have asked a federal appeals court to reinstate their lawsuit alleging ...

Whether a grand jury indictment charging a Silver Creek woman with second-degree murder is reinstated or not now lies in the hands of five judges in the Fourth Department Appellate Division. Ashley ...

The court seemed receptive to his argument that his actions were protected.

The 32-page opinion references "the Watergate scandal" in its very first line — offering context for what the appeals court terms "executive branch abuses of U.S. taxpayers’ information." The post ...

A federal appeals panel is considering whether to allow six Arkansas school districts to enforce a 2025 state law requiring Ten Commandments displays in all public school classrooms. A three-judge ...

Oral argument occupies a privileged place in appellate mythology. It is often described as the moment when judges engage counsel, probe weaknesses, and decide close cases. In modern appellate practice ...

WORLD is a news organization producing Biblically sound, daily coverage of global, national, and cultural current events.

A Federal Court of Appeals will now decide what should happen with Missouri's new Congressional maps. A three-judge panel is debating that answer after oral arguments Thursday morning.

A federal appeals court is set to hear arguments over Missouri's congressional map.

On September 16, 2026, the Massachusetts Appeals Court held oral argument in Trustees of the 350 West Broadway Condominium ...

Oral argument before a trial judge or before an appellate court is a very challenging and rewarding experience for any lawyer. It never ceases to surprise that so many lawyers submit their briefs as ...

Engaging appellate counsel early can improve case strategy, preserve issues, and prevent costly mistakes. It increases the chances of a favorable outcome and saves money in the long run, especially in ...